Is this some kind of twisted performance art piece?!?! What kind of person actually thinks that a human being is justified in killing a house cat that poses no threat. Yes, I could see if someone was being threatened by a possibly rabid animal that one might have to take extreme measures.
But killing someone's pet and then saying that the animal provoked the human being? Last I checked, human beings had superior decision making skills.
Seriously, this is either some kind of elaborate put on or this columnist is a vile person. Maybe both. I have heard that the NY Post tends to be rather sensationalistic, but this is totally nuts.
Any time you attack an innocent animal, a child or someone who is incapacitated, it is never good.
FELONIOUS BALL OF FUR DESERVED EVERY BLOW

THE stupid cat had it coming.
Forgive me, all you animal- rights nuts, you freaky lovers of things furry, fierce and woefully incontinent. I've got something to say to all assorted people who've got nothing better to do with their days than stick their noses in another man's litter box.
The dead cat at the center of a whacked-out catricide trial now eating up precious court time and tax dollars in downtown Manhattan is no innocent wittle victim.
PHOTOS: Man On Trial For Cat Killing
Norman the Cat, who was pummeled to death last year at the age of 8 by an inarguably hot, allegedly drunk, former Met minor leaguer and bit-part actor named Joseph Petcka, had serious issues.
The first of which may have been his name.
Owner Lisa Altobelli testified yesterday that she named Norman after the zhlubby character Norm from "Cheers" - "my favorite show." Norman Bates sounds more accurate.
No one likes to see a little frisky drowning in a pool of his own blood. Well, not many.
...
FELONIOUS BALL OF FUR DESERVED EVERY BLOW - New York Post